should be fine. LieGrue, strub
> Am 17.01.2017 um 00:36 schrieb David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com>: > > As far as my experiments have shown, I can’t modify the git commit messages > to include the jira issue numbers I created to match the commits without > completely losing the git branch structure. > > Therefore I’d like to simply try to merge the ibm contributions directly and > put the git commit hashes into the jira issues. Hopefully I can do this > without problems from Alan’s update of the NOTICE file :-) > > Thoughts? Objections? > > thanks > david jencks > >> On Oct 14, 2016, at 7:46 AM, Alan Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: >> >> Git has been set up: >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-yoko.git >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 3:34 PM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I’m no longer with IBM, but before I left I was strongly encouraged to make >>> the work we did on yoko publicly accessible, so it’s now at >>> https://github.com/djencks/geronimo-yoko >>> >>> Both Joe Chacko and Neil Richards have now filed ICLAs. I somewhat doubt >>> they will have time to massage the existing commits, nor do I know if it’s >>> possible to do without linearizing git history. I’m hoping to have time >>> and energy to experiment with this. At worst I think we could put the git >>> revision hashes into the Jira issues rather than the (preferable) reverse. >>> >>> I’ve seen some vague rumors lately that it’s possible to have some repos >>> under git and some under svn. When I have a little more time I’d like to >>> investigate this. Do we need a vote to authorize changing the yoko repo >>> to git? >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >>> >>> >> >