+1 too Let's make Geronimo the common EE project as it's been discussed. Le ven. 21 avr. 2017 à 07:25, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> Hi Alan! > > Thanks for the feedback! > > ad user@ > > I think it’s useful to have a dev/user lists. The dearth of emails is > due to the lack of activity, not over-organized email lists. > > Yes, but does having 2 mails per year really justify having such a > separate list? Especially when we move over from an 'enduser product' > (Geronimo server) to developer targetting products? > There are many ASF projects which do not have a user@ but a dev list. > I have no hard feelings though, we can get rid of it later as well. Just > wanted to trigger the discussion. > > ad tck@ and servicemix-tck@ > > This email list is for technical discussions concerning the state of TCK > adherence of Geronimo. > > Since we do not have any TCK anymore we probably also don't need it. > The last real traffic is from early 2014 and points to servers which are > long time gone (phoebe). > > EE 6 tests are run as part of TomEE anyway. The involved people have > signed the necessary paperwork. > I'd say we should move on over here. > > ad security@ > > There shouldn’t be any spam on this list since it’s moderated. > > > Well, it's a private list, but it doesn't seem to be moderated. See > yourself > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?secur...@geronimo.apache.org > > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 21.04.2017 um 15:36 schrieb Alan Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com>: > > > > > >> On Apr 21, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> wrote: > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >> We currently have quite a few lists which have very low traffic. > >> > >> My findings are a result of browsing lists.a.o. > >> > >> > >> user@g.a.o -> merge into dev@g.a.o We only had 2 messages in the whole > last year! > > > > > > I think it’s useful to have a dev/user lists. The dearth of emails is > due to the lack of activity, not over-organized email lists. > > > >> xbean-dev@g.a.o -> move to dev@g.a.o > >> > >> xbean-user@g.a.o -> move to dev@g.a.o > >> > >> xbean-scm@g.a.o -> move to scm@g.a.o > > > > There’s already a ticket to remove these. > > > >> geronimo-tck@g.a.o -> Last mail on Feb 2015. Traffic might to to > jcp-private@a.o; With Geronimo server getting discontinued we don't need > the TCK over here anyway > > > > This email list is for technical discussions concerning the state of TCK > adherence of Geronimo. Our TCK contract prohibits discussions of this kind > from being public and only those developers that are “registered” may > participate, i.e. it can’t be folded into the pmc list. If there is any > possibility of future TCK work, it needs to be kept around. > > > >> pmc@g.a.o -> close it; hmm is this still alive? Should all go to > private@g.a.o; > > > > Hmm, we have both? One is not the alias of the other? > > > >> servicemix-tck@g.a.o -> close it; > > > > There’s already a ticket to remove this. > > > >> tck-committs@g.a.o -> close it; > > > > Similar to geronimo-tck@g.a.o, If there is any possibility of future > TCK work, it needs to be kept around. > > > > > >> security@g.a.o -> full of spam! hell, this is a mess, we should drop > it and use private@g.a.o for handling security related things. wdyt? > > > > There shouldn’t be any spam on this list since it’s moderated. I don’t > see any, but I haven’t performed a detailed inventory of my spam folders. > The mailing list security@*.a.o is kinda a known standard where security > organizations can privately report security problems. > > > >> As a result we would keep the following lists: > >> > >> dev@g.a.o > >> private@g.a.o > >> scm@g.a.o (might eventually get renamed to committs@g.a.o to fit other > ASF projects, but that not urgent) > >> > >> > >> Any objections? > >> > >> The VOTE is open for 72h, after that I'll trigger the infra work. > >> > >> Here is my +1 > > > > With that said, I’m a +0.5 to remove those lists for which there is a > ticket. > > > > > > Regards, > > Alan > > > >
