How about "MicroProfile component specification" ? "first implementation of a MicroProfile component specification here at Apache"
-- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > "MP specific specification"? MP 1.0 not being anything special (just > referencing EE without bringing more consistency or features) it can work and > be less ambiguous than "subcomponent" which means not much to me, wdyt? > > Le 17 sept. 2017 05:05, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com > <mailto:david.blev...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >> On Sep 15, 2017, at 5:43 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org >> <mailto:johndam...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:36 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com >> <mailto:david.blev...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 3:54 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org >>> <mailto:johndam...@apache.org>> wrote: >>> >>> as well as being the first release of a MicroProfile specification >>> implementation here at Apache >> >> Note TomEE is the first MP implementation at Apache. We intentionally >> defined MP 1.0 as a subset of the WebProfile so all servers were by default >> MP compatible. TomEE, WildFly, Payara and Liberty were all used in the MP >> 1.0 Conference demo and initial presentations. >> >> >> Sure, are you asking me to rephrase it? I'm referring to the individual >> components, rather than the overall MicroProfile umbrella. > > Yeah, maybe use "first implementation of a MicroProfile sub-component here at > Apache" or something similar. > > MP 1.0, 1.1 are all MicroProfile specifications as well, so someone with that > perspective will read "MicroProfile specification implementation" differently > than intended. > > > -David > > >
