requested the repo:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-opentracing.git

Have fun ;)

BTW, do we want to include opentracing in the repo as well - I think so
since mp spec does pretty much nothing otherwise.
My idea was to start by firing a CDI even with the thing to log and if no
observer we just log it in a particular logger, otherwise we let the
observer handle it the way the app wants. This way we don't need a
particular SPI and we can integrate with logging, kafka or any other
specific backend quite easily.

Wdyt?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le lun. 14 mai 2018 à 12:08, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Yep
>
> If we can do as for jwt auth it sounds sanner. If somebody can request the
> repo (im still offline for 1 day ;)) ill try to start hacking something end
> of the week.
>
> Le lun. 14 mai 2018 09:30, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
>
>> +1 have done similar things since 2005 in my projects. Just with a
>> standard ServletFilter ;)
>>
>> So happy to help.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>> > Am 14.05.2018 um 10:03 schrieb Reinhard Sandtner <
>> reinhard.sandt...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > hey,
>> >
>> > took a very quick look to the spec…
>> > sounds very interesting - maybe something i could use in my $$-project
>> >
>> > +1 for a new repo to play a little bit with it ;)
>> >
>> > lg
>> > reini
>> >
>> >> Am 13.05.2018 um 16:05 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >> Hi guys
>> >>
>> >> Anyone started to have a look to opentracing spec? Im using brave ATM
>> and would be interested to move to a G/MP flavor if not too limited in its
>> current spec.
>> >>
>> >> If noone looked, anyone against a geronimo-opentracing repo we can
>> play with?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to