Hi Raymond We still change some default provider and cache impl details so still makes sense to have them (all for consistency) here
Le ven. 2 nov. 2018 14:51, Raymond Auge <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hey all, > > I want to make sure I understand Geronimo's rational w.r.t. the Specs > sub-project going forward in the face of Jakarta EE and in particular on > the change in licensing, and also on the openness of the process. > > I suppose what I'm trying to accomplish in the long run is to make sure it > is not required to fork the original specs because they just work as > expected for everyone (plain classpath, JPMS, AND OSGi). > > I want to make sure that I put my efforts in the right place. > > Thoughts? > -- > *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile> > (@rotty3000) > Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com> > (@Liferay) > Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> > (@OSGiAlliance) >
