up :), here is the proposal plan I can do - planning to do it in a single repo so it would be an all or nothing release:
1. release all impl with changes this week (week of the 17th) 2. release the aggregator this week as well On 2. I wonder if TomEE guys want to have a look to be able to use it in tomee directly instead of managing each single dependency, I used it with meecrowave - same as tomee can do with its maven plugin - but I didn't review if the tomee-microprofile webapp can rely on it and reduce the cost of TomEE microprofile distro? If not I will just use the versions obtained after 1. and release that. Any blocking/pending changes? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le lun. 19 nov. 2018 à 17:50, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Le lun. 19 nov. 2018 à 16:36, Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> I confess that I didn’t check on the actually source. I’ve used the >> website as reference, so maybe that needs updating: >> >> http://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/config.html -> mentions config >> 1.2.1, there is already API 1.3 >> http://geronimo.apache.org/microprofile/opentracing.html -> mentions >> tracing 1.1 there is already API 1.2 >> >> Source actually seems to fine :) >> >> Could be useful to also include the aggregator version in the webpage. >> > > Will when released ;). > > >> >> Cheers, >> Roberto >> >> On 19 Nov 2018, at 15:16, Bruno Baptista <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> In relation to Safeguard, I'm not in favor of dropping the dependencies >> for the time being. I's too complex and there's the update to version 1.2 >> of the spec that is going to go out soon... We need to keep up with it. >> >> As I mentioned before, I'm interested on this lib and have plans to >> contribute to it soon. >> >> Cheers >> Bruno Baptista >> http://twitter.com/brunobat_ >> >> >> On 19/11/18 15:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >> Hi Roberto, >> >> think tracing is up to date, config was supposed as well. any particular >> API we miss? >> >> yep, i proposed to drop the dependencies of fault-tolerance but it is not >> the most used spec AFAIK so not sure there is any hurry to invest in it >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >> >> Le lun. 19 nov. 2018 à 15:55, Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >>> Hi Romain, >>> >>> I guess I would like to have implementations that target the last few >>> versions of MP. I think we need minor updates for Config and OpenTracing. >>> Plus, we need to figure out what to do with Fault Tolerance. Sometime ago, >>> there was a discussion about dropping Safeguard and replace it with a >>> custom implementation. >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Roberto >>> >>> On 16 Nov 2018, at 08:58, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hey guys, >>> >>> We did some changes in the microprofile libs, mainly extracting the >>> common logic, i wonder what we want to target next and when do we plan to >>> release it? >>> I can likely drive some of them in the coming weeks >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>> >>> >>> >>
