Thanks Romain

Bruno Baptista
https://twitter.com/brunobat_


On 01/04/19 08:55, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi Bruno,

Yes, in https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile/issues/57

Long story short this API just duplicates what is already there. I agree the API can be better but it is the worse solution to introduce yet another API for that, and the disaster is to corrupt other coming specs with this API instead of relying on standards and JVM ones. It is really the kind of "bad good" idea - it looks great but when you start using it you are just locked so you need a bridge....so you didn't gain anything except adding some noise in user land.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le lun. 1 avr. 2019 à 09:22, Bruno Baptista <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :

    Hi Romain,

    Do you have your doubts about the spec whiten somewhere?
    Can you please explain the problem?
    Cheers

    Bruno Baptista
    http://twitter.com/brunobat_

    On 31 Mar 2019, at 21:24, Romain Manni-Bucau
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi guys

    From what I saw it got released and i guess api will not change
    much and spec will sadly not be dropped without actions.

    Wonder if anyone else had a look, share or notmy view and wonder
    if we want to cover it or not @geronimo.

    I had some PoC when it was still a beta, can try to push it
    forward later this week or next one if you think it makes sense
    or we can also be vocal that it is inconsistent with the jvm and
    useless at platform level if we agree on that to try to make it
    removed from microprofile - guess it makes sense in se until j11
    is mainstream?

    Wdyt?

    Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 à 08:52, Romain Manni-Bucau
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :

        Hi guys,

        Seems MP insists to creates this spec even if it is risky and
        likely to be dropped after so I think we have to impl, any
        objection to create a repo for it?


        Romain Manni-Bucau
        @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
        <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
        <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
        <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
        <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
        
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>

Reply via email to