+1

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 3 sept. 2019 à 09:44, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> a
écrit :

> Everything is green now
> [image: image.png]
>
> am I ok to run the release?
>
>
> Le mar. 3 sept. 2019 à 09:35, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> a écrit :
>
>> Oki so let's get it out :)
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>
>>
>> Le mar. 3 sept. 2019 à 09:18, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hi Romain,
>>>
>>> This is the changes I made.
>>> Nothing big or potentially breaking applications.
>>>
>>> It's the signature part yes.
>>> Basically @Repeatable was missing on @Resource and @DataSourceDefinition
>>>
>>> See https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1866293
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le lun. 2 sept. 2019 à 23:29, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>>> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hi JL,
>>>>
>>>> I didnt find the commits in mail archives, is it a list setup issue?
>>>> Does it break binary compatibility/class or method signatures?
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise it sounds good. Can test on a few projects relying on
>>>> annotation bundle tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> Le lun. 2 sept. 2019 à 23:06, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran the TCK for Annotations 1.3.
>>>>> It's simple as it's only signature validation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I found 2 issues that I fixed and now I'd like to do the actual
>>>>> release.
>>>>> Is that ok?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>

Reply via email to