Ok, looked quickly, there is no breaking change I think (just shortcut methods, producer support and some fix on harnessing), can we go back on 1.0.3 please?
This enables maven versioning tools and security auditing tools to not be that lost when comparing versions. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 24 sept. 2019 à 06:42, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a écrit : > Awesome JL. > > Do you have some details about the breaking changes? > > > Le mar. 24 sept. 2019 à 03:51, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > [email protected]> a écrit : > >> All right, created this one for health >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6752 >> I have a fix for a bug in the way we handle producer >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6753 >> >> Since we upgraded to health 2.0 and there are some breaking changes, I >> have bumped up the version to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT. >> >> I don't have the carma to change JIRA and update the version accordingly >> so I have assigned the issues to version Health_1.0.3 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO/fixforversion/12346154> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 11:00 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi JL >>> >>> AFAIK the missing impl are mainly fault tolerance 2 (which adds >>> completionstage support we already have), opentracing 1.3 (which is sadly >>> just minor fixes compared to others and no opentracing upgrade IIRC), and >>> metrics 2 (which mainly split counters in 2 entities). Other specs are >>> ready I think. >>> >>> Do you have different inputs or challenges? >>> >>> The main challenge we are facing as an implementer is to limit user >>> impacts >>> if possible (we dont want to force users to rewrite their app each year >>> so >>> we mitigate it when not made too hard by microprofile). >>> >>> >>> Le lun. 23 sept. 2019 à 02:00, Jean-Louis Monteiro < >>> [email protected]> >>> a écrit : >>> >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I have created a branch named TOMEE-2689_MicroProfile3.0 where I have >>> > upgraded all API's (and therefor TCK) in order to match MicroProfile >>> 3.0. >>> > >>> > Here is the diff >>> > >>> > >>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=commitdiff;h=83812d23512b2ab269435d21962f14202f281912;hp=66230480e1858fed3174c25fa33de58ee93872fe >>> > >>> > Obviously, the TCKs aren't passing anymore because we would need to >>> > upgrade some of our code. >>> > >>> > There is metrics, opentracing, health, rest-client and openapi to >>> > implement or upgrade. >>> > >>> > I'll be starting but I would take any help. >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Jean-Louis Monteiro >>> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >>> > http://www.tomitribe.com >>> > >>> >>
