PS: think i'll just do a very minimum version to be able to merge the v2 on master today or tomorrow before my holidays (next week) but it will likely still need some love (like adding caching in exporters, reworking the metadata/metricId relationship which should go through storing these info in the Metric impl and not only using the registry (this had been broken in the spec in v2 :() etc... so the call for help is still open ;).
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le jeu. 2 janv. 2020 à 12:37, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi all, > > I did a branch mp-metrics-2 on geronimo-metrics project, move of the new > API is supported, the only remaining issue is in the controller part (the > endpoint of the spec) where the formatting is not yet matching the new spec > and some default metrics (base registry) are not yet there by default. > > Does anyone is motivated to take this last step in the upgrade? > I am happy to help anyone in that area if needed but the good news is that > most of the code is very "located" and the main work of that layer to to > "present" the metrics in text (json or plain text) so all the code can be > dropped and redone if it is easier. > > Side note: if nobody took the task on the 20th, I'll probably finish it > myself directly to let us release a version compatible with last spec. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >
