With 7 +1 (3 bindings) this vote passes. I will finish the release steps and start the 1.0.4 later today as mentionned.
Thank you all, I really appreciate review, in particular non-committers feedbacks, thank you guys. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le dim. 16 févr. 2020 à 21:14, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a écrit : > +1 txs! > > LieGrue, > strub > > Am 16.02.2020 um 18:48 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>: > > I maintain my +1. We will fix in next release. > > Regards > JB > > Le dim. 16 f?vr. 2020 ? 18:33, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > a ?crit : > >> Hi guys, >> >> I discovered an error in the default OSGi CDI extension name during the >> registration (it is "implicit"). I will fix it on master. >> Since this release already enables to use the bundle in OSGi - only the >> extension registration will be broken which is not yet mainstream I guess - >> so I guess we can let it go (please don't sing ;)) and do a 1.0.4 tomorrow. >> Please let me know if it is a blocker for you - will commit the fix in >> the 10mn. >> >> Therefore here is my +1 >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >> >> Le dim. 16 f?vr. 2020 ? 02:06, Cesar Hernandez <[email protected]> a >> ?crit : >> >> +1 >> >> El s?b., 15 feb. 2020 a las 14:31, Mark Struberg (<[email protected]>) >> escribi?: >> >> +1 >> >> LieGrue, >> strub >> >> Am 14.02.2020 um 09:22 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >> >: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> As mentionned on the list, here is our jcache implementation release vote. >> Main change is to enable to deploy it in OSGi adding the required >> metadata. >> >> Here is the staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1118 >> Here is the dev dist area: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/simple-jcache/ >> Here is the tag: >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-jcache-simple.git;a=commit;h=67d00ea1d9d1775a549ce972ecb0856d35d419c7 >> My keys is still available in >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS >> >> Please vote: >> >> [ ] +1 let's relese it >> [ ] -1 cancel it because ${reason} >> >> This vote is open for 3 days as usual or untll it gets its 3 binding +1s. >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Atentamente: >> C?sar Hern?ndez. >> >> >
