Why is there any pain? There is _nothing_ which we will change for the current specs. They are binary verified and frozen. The only thing we changed in the last 2 years has been the java9 module name, but that is different in jakartaee anyway plus it's no code change but just a maven thingy.
LieGrue, strub > Am 28.04.2020 um 10:38 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > Clearly the shade option is easier today because it does not require to > maintain 2 branches. > > Do you have pointers on the removed methods? Most specs I reviewed were just > 1-1. > Anyway, it is a first step for us to enable people to play with jakarta > package, we can still adjust things and if the fork is too big we would have > to use jakarta branch but it would be a pain for no gain IMHO. > If it is just about dropping a few methods we can add a shade transformer to > do it IMHO. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > Le mar. 28 avr. 2020 à 10:30, Mark Struberg <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit : > We also have a branch for jakartaee already. > > The question is which one is easier. There are btw slight differences. It is > NOT 1:1! Some methods got removed! > So I'd rather go the branch way. > > LieGrue, > strub > >> Am 28.04.2020 um 07:37 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Should we release jakarta artifacts? >> Short term I'm just expecting a shade added to the default artifact since >> for now it is 1-1 and for jakarta9 we would do the new bundle/artifact as >> usual probably (seems the less costly compromise to me). >> >> If so (we do it now) I can take CDI SE stack + JSONB stack at my charge. >> Happy to get help if anyone is interested. >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
