Looks awesome and is clearly needed, thanks for launching that. Think David's proposal to still mention the server makes sense too.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le sam. 9 mai 2020 à 06:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> a écrit : > It sounds good ! > > Regards > JB > > > Le 8 mai 2020 à 23:38, Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr> a > écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to make a proposal about the Geronimo website > > (https://geronimo.apache.org). > > > > I think the actual website can be simplified because as the Geronimo > > application server is no longer under maintenance, the main goal of the > > Geronimo project is to provider multiple sub-projects like: > > > > - JavaEE/JakartaEE specifications > > > > - XBean > > > > - Microprofile implementation > > > > - Arthur > > > > - BatchEE > > > > (may be more?) > > > > All the subproject can provide their own documentation website and we > > could only have a one page for https://geronimo.apache.org to show a > > presentation of all sub-projects. > > > > We could keep the old site for archives and add a link reference on the > > new one. > > > > I started a proposal for a simple one page static site here: > > > > https://openobject.fr/apache-geronimo/ > > > > Thoughts? > > > > regards, > > > > -- > > François > > fpa...@apache.org > > > > > >
