It would have been better yes Le ven. 15 oct. 2021 à 15:17, Zowalla, Richard < [email protected]> a écrit :
> Shouldn't it be spec v1.0.1 in the POM: > > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/blob/geronimo-javamail_1.6-1.0.1/geronimo-javamail_1.6/pom.xml#L46 > > I am just curios and might be wrong? :) > > > Am Dienstag, dem 12.10.2021 um 22:51 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: > > Hi! > > > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) > > 1.0.1 > > Importante note: we previously voted for the spec part. This vote is > > for the provider and the mail core. > > > > Here is the staging repo > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1142 > > > > And the source jar which is voted on > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.6-1.0.1-source-release.zip > > > > Git tag > > > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/tree/geronimo-javamail_1.6-1.0.1 > > > > My key can be found at > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS > > > > please VOTE > > [+1] all fine, ship it > > [+0] don't care > > [-1] stop, because ${reason} > > > > The VOTE is open for 72h. > > Jean-Louis > -- Jean-Louis
