Regarding our MP implementation, someone knows why the TomEE team
decided to move from our to Smallrye?
As TomEE is an Apache project, it can make sense to use and promote the
Apache implementation of MP...
regards,
Francois
On 23/11/2022 11:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
In terms of storage and committers you are right but in terms of users
a key difference is "will it be a new release".
If you look at MP it is quite unlikely since project seems way less
consummed than it was some years ago and since TomEE moves to smallrye
at the same time we don't update it anymore, not sure we would do any
new release.
So while it is ok to keep it there, we should also communicate clearly
we don't intend to do any new release if it is the case - same story
than geronimo server basically.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
<https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le mer. 23 nov. 2022 à 11:00, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>
a écrit :
Yeah I understand there isn't much activity, but from time to
time, they are updated to follow specifications and they are used
by other projects (transaction manager, batchEE, etc). So they
need a home. Of course we can split them apart and give them to
different projects, but it does not solve any problem. The people
are the same. As soon as we allow all projects to contribute or
even become committers here, I don't see any issue at the moment
at least.
Le mer. 23 nov. 2022 à 10:53, Mark Struberg via dev
<dev@geronimo.apache.org> a écrit :
/Overall I don't understand the recent discussions to kill
all Geronimo projects and subprojects./
/+1/
/
/
Actually I'd rather keep it here as it is used outside TomEE
as well.
LieGrue,
strub
Am 23.11.2022 um 10:15 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
<jeano...@gmail.com>:
I've opened a thread on the TomEE side to maybe transition
BatchEE to TomEE.
/Overall I don't understand the recent discussions to kill
all Geronimo projects and subprojects./
Le mar. 22 nov. 2022 à 23:33, Romain Manni-Bucau
<rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit :
No requirement, just making it living (updating versions
and spec impl).
Le mar. 22 nov. 2022 à 23:31, Mark Struberg via dev
<dev@geronimo.apache.org> a écrit :
I still use batchee very much. So I'd keep it well
alive. Also investing time on and on.
Is there anything which is required to do?
LieGrue,
strub
Am 18.11.2022 um 09:50 schrieb Francois Papon
<francois.pa...@openobject.fr>:
Hi,
I don't have insights about how BatchEE is used
today and how the jbatch specification is support by
others.
+1 for freeze.
regards,
François
On 18/11/2022 08:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi all,
We discussed some time ago to drop batchee as an
active subproject, wonder where we are now on this?
Do we freeze it and document we don't maintain it
anymore?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github
<https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
<https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
--
Jean-Louis
--
Jean-Louis
