I think we have sufficient votes now. Can we proceed with this release? It is pending for > 1 month now.
On 2024/08/10 11:40:57 Richard Zowalla wrote: > @JL Has enough votes now? Can we proceed here? Thx > > On 2024/07/22 16:21:21 Mark Struberg via dev wrote: > > +1 > > > > LueGrue, > > strub > > > > > Am 10.06.2024 um 16:03 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more > > > than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec > > > 2.1 > > > > > > SVN Tag > > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/ > > > > > > Staging repo > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170 > > > > > > Sources > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1170/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/1.0.0/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0-source-release.zip > > > > > > Dist > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/specs/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/ > > > > > > The release notes are > > > Bug > > > > > > [GERONIMO-6869 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869>] - > > > InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same > > > address > > > [GERONIMO-6870 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870>] - > > > RFC822 violation with duplicated headers > > > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary number > > > of votes are reached. > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis > > > > >
