[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13408112#comment-13408112
 ] 

Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-200:
------------------------------------

Hey, sorry for the delay. I ran your patch against the current trunk today and 
got this:


Results :

Tests run: 94, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

so I think you're in good shape, whatever it was that was not passing tests 
seems to pass on my local repo. I could run this on the cluster if you want, 
but its a real cluster and not psuedo-distributed one like you said the test 
failed on, so I'm not sure my results would be the same. Let me know if you're 
still having a problem with it and I can do that for you to see what happens. I 
might still have a pseudo cluster setup on my home machine, I can check

                
> remove hadoop RPC and keep just netty
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GIRAPH-200
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-200
>             Project: Giraph
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0
>            Reporter: Claudio Martella
>            Assignee: Alessandro Presta
>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>
>         Attachments: GIRAPH-200.patch, GIRAPH-200.patch, GIRAPH-200.patch
>
>
> Given the netty communication behaves faster than rpc, we should just keep 
> netty-based and drop the older one.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to