I still have problems. Now Review Board complains when I'm uploading a
diff that contains new/renamed files.

I've tried to use post-review instead but it fails with:

==> HTTP Authentication Required
Enter authorization information for "Web API" at reviews.apache.org
Username: apresta       
Password: 
Error creating review request: You are not logged in (HTTP 401, API Error
103)


On 7/13/12 11:39 PM, "Avery Ching" <[email protected]> wrote:

>It's fixed now =).  By the way, I use git-svn and post-review.  Works
>very well together.
>
>Avery
>
>On 7/13/12 1:50 PM, Avery Ching wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I have replicated the same problem and filed a task on INFRA to help us.
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5046
>>
>> Thanks for reporting the issue,
>>
>> Avery
>>
>> On 7/12/12 1:36 PM, Eli Reisman wrote:
>>> I use git so I'm not sure. I have heard IntelliJ is not good at
>>> generating
>>> patches for Giraph, and even IntelliJ pros like Jakob do that part at
>>> the
>>> command line.
>>>
>>> were you trying to upload into the repo or just upload a diff file to
>>> the
>>> JIRA page for 244?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Alessandro Presta
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to create a review for GIRAPH-244, but I can't seem to
>>>> successfully upload the diff.
>>>>
>>>> I get: The file "
>>>> 
>>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/g
>>>>iraph/graph/TestIntIntNullIntVertex.java"
>>>>
>>>> (revision 1360122) was not found in the repository
>>>>
>>>> I tried generating the patch from IntelliJ or directly with "svn diff
>>>>>
>>>> GIRAPH-244.patch" using svn 1.7.5.
>>>> I made sure that the base revision number was the same as the repo
>>>> (being
>>>> shared among all Apache projects, it changes very frequently).
>>>> I tried putting "trunk" as base dir, "giraph/trunk", the full URL to
>>>> the
>>>> repo and all possible substrings I can think of.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone succeeded in adding a review lately?
>>>>
>>>> Alessandro
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to