[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13425432#comment-13425432
 ] 

Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-275:
------------------------------------

So far, HDFS tests are showing this locations information is not populated in 
our InputSplit objects due to the way BspInputFormat, VertexInputFormat are 
faking out Hadoop input formats. i'm wondering if there's a way to ask HDFS to 
do this from the Giraph side, as it does this for Hadoop when a filesystem that 
is appropriate (like HDFS) is the one in use for that job run? Maybe a command 
line option? I am told MapReduce does not require locality, it just takes 
advantage of BlockLocations when the right filesystem to take advantage of it 
is selected for that job.

If anyone else tries this and gets the locality info in the splits that the 
Hadoop end of our RecordReaders/IO formats use, please let me know. I am going 
to look more at the Hadoop end of things and try to get the information into 
the InputSplit objects. It would be really helpful to get locality on the 
Giraph end of the INPUT_SUPERSTEP with minimal abuse of the name node.

                
> Restore data locality to workers reading InputSplits where possible without 
> querying NameNode, ZooKeeper
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GIRAPH-275
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-275
>             Project: Giraph
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: bsp, graph
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0
>            Reporter: Eli Reisman
>            Assignee: Eli Reisman
>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>
>         Attachments: GIRAPH-275-1.patch
>
>
> During INPUT_SUPERSTEP, workers wait on a barrier until the master has 
> created a complete list of available input splits. Once the barrier is past, 
> each worker iterates through this list of input splits, creating a znode to 
> lay claim to the next unprocessed split the worker encounters.
> For a brief moment while the master is creating the input split znodes each 
> worker iterates through, it has access to InputSplit objects that also 
> contain a list of hostnames on which the blocks of the file are hosted. By 
> including that list of locations in each znode pathname we can allow each 
> worker reading the list of available splits to sort it so that splits the 
> worker attempts to claim first are the ones that contain a block that is 
> local to that worker's host.
> This allows the possibility for many workers to end up reading at least one 
> split that is local to its own host. If the input split selected holds a 
> local block, the RecordReader Hadoop supplies us with will automatically read 
> from that block anyway. By supplying this locality data as part of the znode 
> name rather than info inside the znode, we avoid reading the data from each 
> znode while sorting, which is only currently done when a split is claimed and 
> which is IO intensive. Sorting the string path data is cheap and faster, and 
> making the final split znode's name longer doesn't seem to matter too much.
> By using the BspMaster's InputSplit data to include locality information in 
> the znode path directly, we also avoid having to access the 
> FileSystem/BlockLocations directly from either master or workers, which could 
> also flood the name node with queries. This is the only place I've found 
> where some locality information is already available to Giraph free of 
> additional cost.
> Finally, by sorting each worker's split list this way, we get the 
> contention-reduction of GIRAPH-250 for free, since only workers on the same 
> host will be likely to contend for a split instead of the current situation 
> in which all workers contend for the same input splits from the same list, 
> iterating from the same index. GIRAPH-250 has already been logged as reducing 
> pages of contention on the first pass (when using many 100's of workers) down 
> to 0-3 contentions before claiming a split to read.
> This passes 'mvn verify' etc. I will post results of cluster testing ASAP. If 
> anyone else could try this on an HDFS cluster where locality info is supplied 
> to InputSplit objects, I would be really interested to see other folks' 
> results.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to