[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13465926#comment-13465926
 ] 

Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-328:
------------------------------------

Hi Avery, I'm posting a new patch (v6) that fixes the things you mentioned on 
review board. This patch doesn't build as there is still a problem with the 
GiraphConfiguration calls to create my I and M values. Here's the error I get. 
This is why I think I used BspUtils in the previous patch. The error dump is 
this (below). I will check this later when I have time but the calls are in 
this patch if you think I'm calling the new methods wrong let me know.

{code}
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR : 
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] 
/home/computer/apache/giraph/target/munged/main/org/apache/giraph/comm/requests/SendPartitionCurrentMessagesRequest.java:[80,45]
 incompatible types
found   : org.apache.hadoop.io.WritableComparable
required: I
[ERROR] 
/home/computer/apache/giraph/target/munged/main/org/apache/giraph/comm/requests/SendPartitionCurrentMessagesRequest.java:[87,52]
 incompatible types
found   : org.apache.hadoop.io.Writable
required: M
[INFO] 2 errors 
[INFO] -------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 9.786s
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Sep 28 14:30:36 PDT 2012
[INFO] Final Memory: 17M/155M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
{code}
                
> Outgoing messages from current superstep should be grouped at the sender by 
> owning worker, not by partition
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GIRAPH-328
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-328
>             Project: Giraph
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: bsp, graph
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0
>            Reporter: Eli Reisman
>            Assignee: Eli Reisman
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>
>         Attachments: GIRAPH-328-1.patch, GIRAPH-328-2.patch, 
> GIRAPH-328-3.patch, GIRAPH-328-4.patch, GIRAPH-328-5.patch, GIRAPH-328-6.patch
>
>
> Currently, outgoing messages created by the Vertex#compute() cycle on each 
> worker are stored and grouped by the partitionId on the destination worker to 
> which the messages belong. This results in messages being duplicated on the 
> wire per partition on a given receiving worker that has delivery vertices for 
> those messages.
> By partitioning the outgoing, current-superstep messages by destination 
> worker, we can split them into partitions at insertion into a MessageStore on 
> the destination worker. What we trade in come compute time while inserting at 
> the receiver side, we gain in fine grained control over the real number of 
> messages each worker caches outbound for any given worker before flushing, 
> and how those flush messages are aggregated for delivery as well. 
> Potentially, it allows for a great reduction in duplicate messages sent in 
> situations like Vertex#sendMessageToAllEdges() -- see GIRAPH-322, GIRAPH-314. 
> You get the idea.
> This might be a poor idea, and it can certainly use some additional 
> refinement, but it passes mvn verify and may even run ;) It interoperates 
> with the disk spill code, but not as well as it could. Consider this a 
> request for comment on the idea (and the approach) rather than a finished 
> product.
> Comments/ideas/help welcome! Thanks

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to