-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7975/#review13375
-----------------------------------------------------------


This is almost ready to go.  Looks great, although I will need to get rid of 
all your collection methods in the future (don't worry about it now) to support 
byte [] based messaging.


http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/messages/OneMessagePerVertexStore.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7975/#comment28657>

    Given the way we are using this, should we rename getNeutralMessage() to 
createInitialMessage()?



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/netty/NettyWorkerServer.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7975/#comment28664>

    Perhaps a bit more info would be nice
    
    "Using OneMessagePervertexStore since combiner enabled"
    
    



http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/graph/Combiner.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7975/#comment28651>

    I should have mentioned this earlier but 
    
    getNeutralMessage() sounds a bit strange.  


- Avery Ching


On Nov. 12, 2012, 6:39 p.m., Maja Kabiljo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7975/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 12, 2012, 6:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for giraph.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Current combiner interface is very general, but also doesn't provide the best 
> performance. All the combiners we currently have are binary combiners, i.e. 
> they can combine two messages into one. Having a lists around this simple 
> concept makes it slower and requires more object creations.
> Adding BinaryCombiner, and a specialized message store which will be used 
> with it. This message store has only one message per vertex instead of having 
> a collection per vertex.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug GIRAPH-414.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-414
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/GiraphConfiguration.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/GiraphRunner.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/ImmutableClassesGiraphConfiguration.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/benchmark/PageRankBenchmark.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/messages/CollectionOfMessagesPerVertexStore.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/messages/DiskBackedMessageStore.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/messages/OneMessagePerVertexStore.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/messages/SimpleMessageStore.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/netty/NettyWorkerServer.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/DoubleSumCombiner.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/MinimumDoubleCombiner.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/MinimumIntCombiner.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/SimpleSumCombiner.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/graph/BspUtils.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/graph/Combiner.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/graph/GiraphTypeValidator.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/graph/VertexCombiner.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/utils/InternalVertexRunner.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/TestVertexTypes.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/ConnectionTest.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/RequestFailureTest.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/RequestTest.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/SaslConnectionTest.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/comm/TestMessageStores.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/MinimumIntCombinerTest.java
>  1406748 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/giraph/trunk/giraph/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/utils/MockUtils.java
>  1406748 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7975/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> mvn verify
> 
> PageRankBenchmark
> 20m vertices, 100 edges per vertex, 20 workers
> 1 compute thread, superstep time 55s->45s
> 6 compute threads, superstep time 28s->15s
> 12 compute threads, 1 netty server thread, superstep time 185s->112s
> 
> Our internal application
> Similar speedup as Page Rank
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Maja Kabiljo
> 
>

Reply via email to