[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556748#comment-13556748
 ] 

Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-472:
------------------------------------

nice. I have not updated it, since I rolled it up into GIRAPH-469 by
accident, but if this is still good (should be?) then I am happy to rebase
469, or we can resolve this and hit the issue on 469 directly, your call.
Thanks!




                
> Refactor MapFunctions enum to be more general
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GIRAPH-472
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-472
>             Project: Giraph
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: graph
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0
>            Reporter: Eli Reisman
>            Assignee: Eli Reisman
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: GIRAPH-472.patch
>
>
> In preparation for refactors like GIRAPH-469, lets make some of the 
> boilerplate code in and around GraphMapper more general and behavior-oriented 
> and less Hadoopy.
> To this end, lets make the MapFunctions enum into something more general we 
> can make use of in multiple driver implementations including those that are 
> not based on MRv1 or GraphMapper.
> This passes 'mvn verify' on today's trunk but the giraph-accumulo part of the 
> build fails. After grepping the accumulo code, I don't see anything affected 
> by MapFunctions so I'm assuming this is an unrelated matter. ;)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to