+1 (examples could be used for tutorial purposes).
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Mirko Kämpf <mirko.kae...@cloudera.com>wrote: > +1 > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Sebastian Schelter <s...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On 12.03.2013 20:33, Jake Mannix wrote: > > > +1 to this distinction > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Avery Ching <ach...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > >> My thoughts were that examples would be like toy examples (not > suitable > > >> for production) that might be used, say, for unittesting. > Applications > > >> would be full-fledged ready to run applications that should have > > perhaps a > > >> supporting input format for actual data. > > >> > > >> > > >> On 3/12/13 12:19 PM, Claudio Martella wrote: > > >> > > >>> My thoughts are: what is the difference then between the applications > > and > > >>> the examples package? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Avery Ching <ach...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>> HI Nicolas, > > >>>> > > >>>> I'd be interested in seeing this algorithm implemented in Giraph. My > > >>>> suggestion would be to put it directly in Giraph. We should create > a > > new > > >>>> maven module called giraph-applications and then maybe something > like > > >>>> org.apache.giraph.application.****affinity package. You can see > > >>>> org.apache.giraph.examples as an example. We should also move the > > other > > >>>> actual applications out of examples so that they are easier to run. > > >>>> Anyone > > >>>> else have any thoughts? > > >>>> > > >>>> Avery > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> On 3/12/13 12:12 PM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> I am not sure what you think by integration, but I am implementing > > the > > >>>>> affinity propagation algorithm proposed by Frey and Dueck [1]. And > > >>>>> Giraph > > >>>>> is a perfect fit for the implementation. And I was wondering, if I > > have > > >>>>> the > > >>>>> opportunity to contribute that implementation, where should I post > > it ? > > >>>>> Giraph since it is based on it ? Or Mahout along with the other > > >>>>> clustering > > >>>>> algorithm ? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I just subscribed to mahout-dev@ in case some discussion starts > > there > > >>>>> too. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Nicolas > > >>>>> > > >>>>> [1] http://www.psi.toronto.edu/****affinitypropagation/**< > > http://www.psi.toronto.edu/**affinitypropagation/**> > > >>>>> FreyDueckScience07.pdf<http://**www.psi.toronto.edu/** > > >>>>> affinitypropagation/**FreyDueckScience07.pdf< > > http://www.psi.toronto.edu/affinitypropagation/FreyDueckScience07.pdf> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Le 12 mars 2013 à 08:50, Sebastian Schelter <s...@apache.org> a > > écrit : > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi fellow Giraphers, > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> on Mahout's dev@ mailinglist, there is a discussion about a > > potential > > >>>>>> (experimental) future integration of Giraph. Might be good to hear > > your > > >>>>>> opinion about that. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Best, > > >>>>>> Sebastian > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- > Mirko Kämpf > > *Trainer* @ Cloudera > > tel: +49 *176 20 63 51 99* > skype: *kamir1604* > mi...@cloudera.com > -- Gustavo Salazar Torres --------------------------------- - "When describing your own work, be humble and don’t use superlatives of praise, either explicitly or implicitly, even if you are enthusiastic" - Mathematical Writing, Donald Knuth
