We haven't been using it at FB yet, it's a great step in that direction
though.
On 2/11/14, 3:52 PM, Claudio Martella wrote:
One additional issue that might go in could be an add-on to the
documentation about the python interface. I remember nitay mentioned not to
do a big fuzz about it because it was not heavily tested. Maybe the
facebook people can say something about it? If reliable, this would be one
of the major points of this release, IMO.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:47 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>wrote:
Great! The list of JIRAs scheduled to go into 1.1.0 looks pretty
manageable now:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%221.1.0%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20GIRAPH%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC%2C%20summary%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC
I am really counting on being able to cut release branches
over the weekend.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Claudio Martella
<claudio.marte...@gmail.com> wrote:
please give it a test. i've been working on this with armando. i'll give
a
review, but we have been testing it for while. we'd really appreciate if
somebody else could run some additional tests as well. thanks!
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Sebastian Schelter <s...@apache.org>
wrote:
I'll test the patch from GIRAPH-825 this week.
On 02/12/2014 12:10 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi!
Given how big the diff here are:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-825
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-840
I am wondering whether it is realistic
to have them in 1.1.0.
Would appreciate folks chiming in.
Thanks,
Roman.
--
Claudio Martella
