> On Aug. 14, 2014, 8:01 nachm., Sergey Edunov wrote:
> > giraph-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/scc/SccComputation.java,
> >  line 204
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/24665/diff/1/?file=659562#file659562line204>
> >
> >     No need to create LongWritable here as well

Done!


- Gianluca


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24665/#review50621
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 15, 2014, 8:31 vorm., Gianluca Righetto wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/24665/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 15, 2014, 8:31 vorm.)
> 
> 
> Review request for giraph.
> 
> 
> Repository: giraph-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Review the second version of the patch for the issue GIRAPH-931 (Provide a 
> Strongly Connected Components algorithm).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   giraph-examples/pom.xml 90f6889 
>   
> giraph-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/scc/SccComputation.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/scc/SccLongLongNullTextInputFormat.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/scc/SccPhaseMasterCompute.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/scc/SccVertexValue.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-examples/src/main/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/scc/package-info.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> giraph-examples/src/test/java/org/apache/giraph/examples/scc/SccComputationTestInMemory.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24665/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> This has been tested on a real cluster using two of the Stanford's SNAP 
> datasets. Also, a new in-memory test is provided in the patch.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gianluca Righetto
> 
>

Reply via email to