Hi Roman, Yes, that's exactly what I meant! Thank you!
Regards, Sergey Edunov On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > Hi Sergey! > > I'm a little bit concerned when you say 'migrate'. Our primary repo > still has to reside on ASF side. If what you meant is integration as > per: > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and > > I'm super +1 (and its trivial too!). > > Thanks, > Roman. > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Sergey Edunov <edu...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi Giraph Devs, >> >> Now, when the Giraph 1.2.0 is out, I wanted to bring up a question of >> migration to Github. >> There are multiple reasons to migrate: >> 1) Code reviews. We're using reviews.facebook.net which is going to be >> discontinued soon. We can also use Apache review board, but it is much >> less convenient. >> 2) Github is industry wide standard and many potential contributors >> feel more comfortable using it. >> 3) Pull requests are so sweet and provide better tracking (we have >> many features and fixes buried in our JIRA, and it is very >> discouraging for new contributors) >> 4) There is already Giraph mirror on Github: >> https://github.com/apache/giraph and there are few pull requests which >> we have never accepted. >> >> What do you think? If nobody objects, I'll initiate migration process >> and post an update when it is done. >> >> Regards, >> Sergey Edunov
