Will-Lo commented on code in PR #3727:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/3727#discussion_r1279760164
##########
gobblin-service/src/main/java/org/apache/gobblin/service/modules/orchestration/Orchestrator.java:
##########
@@ -374,9 +358,41 @@ public void orchestrate(Spec spec, Properties jobProps,
long triggerTimestampMil
Instrumented.updateTimer(this.flowOrchestrationTimer, System.nanoTime() -
startTime, TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS);
}
+ /**
+ * Abstraction used to populate the message of and emit a FlowCompileFailed
event for the Orchestrator.
+ * @param spec
+ * @param flowMetadata
+ */
+ public void emitFlowCompilationFailedEvent(Spec spec, Map<String, String>
flowMetadata) {
+ // For scheduled flows, we do not insert the flowExecutionId into the
FlowSpec. As a result, if the flow
+ // compilation fails (i.e. we are unable to find a path), the metadata
will not have flowExecutionId.
+ // In this case, the current time is used as the flow executionId.
+
flowMetadata.putIfAbsent(TimingEvent.FlowEventConstants.FLOW_EXECUTION_ID_FIELD,
+ Long.toString(System.currentTimeMillis()));
+
+ String message = "Flow was not compiled successfully.";
+ if (!((FlowSpec) spec).getCompilationErrors().isEmpty()) {
+ message = message + " Compilation errors encountered: " + ((FlowSpec)
spec).getCompilationErrors();
+ }
+ _log.warn(message);
+ flowMetadata.put(TimingEvent.METADATA_MESSAGE, message);
+
+ Optional<TimingEvent> flowCompileFailedTimer =
eventSubmitter.transform(submitter ->
+ new TimingEvent(submitter,
TimingEvent.FlowTimings.FLOW_COMPILE_FAILED));
+
+ if (flowCompileFailedTimer.isPresent()) {
+ flowCompileFailedTimer.get().stop(flowMetadata);
+ }
+ }
+
public void submitFlowToDagManager(FlowSpec flowSpec)
throws IOException {
- submitFlowToDagManager(flowSpec, specCompiler.compileFlow(flowSpec));
+ Dag<JobExecutionPlan> jobExecutionPlanDag =
specCompiler.compileFlow(flowSpec);
+ if (jobExecutionPlanDag == null || jobExecutionPlanDag.isEmpty()) {
+ emitFlowCompilationFailedEvent(flowSpec,
TimingEventUtils.getFlowMetadata(flowSpec));
+ return;
+ }
+ submitFlowToDagManager(flowSpec, jobExecutionPlanDag);
Review Comment:
So I'm wondering why we don't directly call the `orchestrate()` function
from the SpecMonitor instead of `submitFlowToDagManager`, because there are a
few more checks done in that function, namely:
1. Checking for another execution
2. Ensuring that the specCompiler is ready before compilation (happens less
these days with a file based compiler but still possible that there will be a
race condition introduced where you try to compile a flow when the service
starts up but the flowgraph is not finished loading into memory).
If this is not possible, we need to abstract these checks to another
function and ensure that they're done before submitting to the dagmanager in
any configuration.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
