[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-2062?focusedWorklogId=918030&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-918030
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on GOBBLIN-2062:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 07/May/24 07:43
            Start Date: 07/May/24 07:43
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: phet commented on code in PR #3944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/3944#discussion_r1591963116


##########
gobblin-service/src/test/java/org/apache/gobblin/service/modules/orchestration/OrchestratorTest.java:
##########
@@ -81,12 +84,15 @@ public class OrchestratorTest {
 
   private FlowCatalog flowCatalog;
   private FlowSpec flowSpec;
-  private Orchestrator orchestrator;
+
+  private FlowStatusGenerator mockFlowStatusGenerator;
+  private DagManager mockDagManager;
+  private Orchestrator dagMgrNotFlowLaunchHandlerBasedOrchestrator;
   private static final String TEST_USER = "testUser";
   private static final String TEST_PASSWORD = "testPassword";
   private static final String TEST_TABLE = "quotas";
 
-  @BeforeClass
+  @BeforeMethod

Review Comment:
   I agree and now realize, after you pointed it out, that I didn't cover all 
test init best practice, so much as denounce what's broken about 
`@BeforeClass`-only init.
   
   to encapsulate a fuller picture now, I'd advise
   
   > prefer `@{Before,After}Method` test init to `@{Before,After}Class`".  when 
mocks are in use, the latter w/o the former, MOST LIKELY indicates the wrong 
choice, whereas having only method, but not class-level init is quite fine.  In 
fact the only really acceptable reason for choosing class-level init is to 
amortize payment of initialization tax just once per class, rather than 
incurring once per test case.
   
   at the moment, I can't think of any non-performance-motivated argument to 
use `@BeforeClass` over just adding everything into `@BeforeMethod`





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 918030)
    Time Spent: 2h 10m  (was: 2h)

> adhoc flow failure due to concurrent execs must be removed from flow catalog
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GOBBLIN-2062
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-2062
>             Project: Apache Gobblin
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: gobblin-service
>            Reporter: Kip Kohn
>            Assignee: Abhishek Tiwari
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 2h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> the Orchestrator + DagManager MUST remove adhoc flows that violate concurrent 
> execs from the flow catalog.  otherwise gaas will continue to return '409 
> Conflict' to each subsequent attempt to create an adhoc flow with the same 
> flowGroup+flowName.  this is despite the fact that the flow (which still 
> remains in the FlowCatalog, when it shouldn't be) already has the status 
> FAILED, which is a "final status".



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to