[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-2159?focusedWorklogId=936232&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-936232
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on GOBBLIN-2159:
-------------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 24/Sep/24 23:54
Start Date: 24/Sep/24 23:54
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: phet commented on code in PR #4058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/4058#discussion_r1774163311
##########
gobblin-data-management/src/test/java/org/apache/gobblin/data/management/copy/iceberg/IcebergTableTest.java:
##########
@@ -333,4 +338,120 @@ protected static <T> void verifyAnyOrder(Collection<T>
actual, Collection<T> exp
protected static <T, C extends Collection<T>> List<T> flatten(Collection<C>
cc) {
return cc.stream().flatMap(x -> x.stream()).collect(Collectors.toList());
}
+
+ @Test
+ public void testGetPartitionSpecificDataFiles() throws IOException {
+ TableIdentifier testTableId = TableIdentifier.of(dbName, "testTable");
+ Table testTable = catalog.createTable(testTableId, icebergSchema,
icebergPartitionSpec);
+
+ List<String> paths = Arrays.asList(
+ "/path/tableName/data/id=1/file1.orc",
+ "/path/tableName/data/id=1/file3.orc",
+ "/path/tableName/data/id=1/file5.orc",
+ "/path/tableName/data/id=1/file4.orc",
+ "/path/tableName/data/id=1/file2.orc"
Review Comment:
the `/id=1/` naming convention isn't necessary, is it?
(i.e. all iceberg partition info is managed separately from the file paths,
correct?)
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 936232)
Time Spent: 0.5h (was: 20m)
> Support Partition Based Copy in Iceberg Distcp
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GOBBLIN-2159
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-2159
> Project: Apache Gobblin
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Vivek Rai
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
