[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13901125#comment-13901125
 ] 

Henry Saputra edited comment on GORA-228 at 3/2/14 5:32 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------

I am having a concern about the patch.

In the patch we have this:
{code}
   public Result<K, T> execute(Query<K, T> query) {
     K startKey = query.getStartKey();
     K endKey = query.getEndKey();
     if(startKey == null) {
       startKey = (K) map.firstKey();
     }
     if(endKey == null) {
       endKey = (K) map.lastKey();
     }
 ....
     return new MemResult<K,T>(this, query, submap);
   }
{code}

Given that "map" is static then it will shared by many MemStore within a JVM. 
The Key may or may not be same types, which in this case, the code:
  startKey = (K) map.firstKey();
could throw exception for illegal casting.

Thoughts?


was (Author: hsaputra):
I am having a concern about the patch.

In the patch we have this:
   public Result<K, T> execute(Query<K, T> query) {
     K startKey = query.getStartKey();
     K endKey = query.getEndKey();
     if(startKey == null) {
       startKey = (K) map.firstKey();
     }
     if(endKey == null) {
       endKey = (K) map.lastKey();
     }
 ....
     return new MemResult<K,T>(this, query, submap);
   }

Given that "map" is static then it will shared by many MemStore within a JVM. 
The Key may or may not be same types, which in this case, the code:
  startKey = (K) map.firstKey();
could throw exception for illegal casting.

Thoughts?

> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException when using MemStore for concurrent 
> tests
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GORA-228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-228
>             Project: Apache Gora
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: gora-core
>    Affects Versions: 0.3
>            Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Assignee: Yasin Kılınç
>             Fix For: 0.4
>
>         Attachments: GORA-228.patch
>
>
> Finally, a multithreaded test in [3] fails with the following
> {code}
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
>       at 
> java.util.TreeMap$NavigableSubMap$SubMapIterator.nextEntry(TreeMap.java:1594)
>       at 
> java.util.TreeMap$NavigableSubMap$SubMapKeyIterator.next(TreeMap.java:1655)
>       at 
> org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStore$MemResult.nextInner(MemStore.java:81)
>       at org.apache.gora.query.impl.ResultBase.next(ResultBase.java:112)
>       at 
> org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage.readWrite(TestGoraStorage.java:74)
>       at 
> org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage.access$100(TestGoraStorage.java:41)
>       at 
> org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage$1.call(TestGoraStorage.java:107)
>       at 
> org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage$1.call(TestGoraStorage.java:102)
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> {code}
> I believe that the final failure is due to to the use of TreeMap [5] as a 
> private object in MemStore. TreeMap implementations are not synchronized. If 
> multiple threads access a map concurrently, and at least one of the threads 
> modifies the map structurally, it must be synchronized externally. (A 
> structural modification is any operation that adds or deletes one or more 
> mappings; merely changing the value associated with an existing key is not a 
> structural modification.) This is typically accomplished by synchronizing on 
> some object that naturally encapsulates the map. If no such object exists, 
> the map should be "wrapped" using the Collections.synchronizedSortedMap 
> method. This is best done at creation time, to prevent accidental 
> unsynchronized access to the map e.g.
>    SortedMap m = Collections.synchronizedSortedMap(new TreeMap(...));
> N.B. The NOTE on TreeMap's come right from the Oracle JavaDoc.
> [3] 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/nutch/branches/2.x/src/test/org/apache/nutch/storage/TestGoraStorage.java?view=markup
> [4] 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/nutch/branches/2.x/src/test/org/apache/nutch/util/AbstractNutchTest.java?view=markup
> [5] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/TreeMap.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to