[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14720917#comment-14720917
 ] 

Hudson commented on GORA-228:
-----------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in gora-trunk #1607 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/gora-trunk/1607/])
Revert to ed768b4be6af4cc8fa18fa11bdb01c616101afbe botched commit for GORA-228 
java.util.ConcurrentModificationException when using MemStore for concurrent 
tests (lewis.j.mcgibbney: rev 08c48d966475f7485b66beeb0b2f4591499b427a)
* gora-core/src/main/java/org/apache/gora/memory/store/MemStore.java
* CHANGES.txt


> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException when using MemStore for concurrent 
> tests
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GORA-228
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-228
>             Project: Apache Gora
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: gora-core
>    Affects Versions: 0.3
>            Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
>             Fix For: 0.7
>
>         Attachments: GORA-228.patch, GORA-228v2.patch
>
>
> Finally, a multithreaded test in [3] fails with the following
> {code}
> java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
>       at 
> java.util.TreeMap$NavigableSubMap$SubMapIterator.nextEntry(TreeMap.java:1594)
>       at 
> java.util.TreeMap$NavigableSubMap$SubMapKeyIterator.next(TreeMap.java:1655)
>       at 
> org.apache.gora.memory.store.MemStore$MemResult.nextInner(MemStore.java:81)
>       at org.apache.gora.query.impl.ResultBase.next(ResultBase.java:112)
>       at 
> org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage.readWrite(TestGoraStorage.java:74)
>       at 
> org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage.access$100(TestGoraStorage.java:41)
>       at 
> org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage$1.call(TestGoraStorage.java:107)
>       at 
> org.apache.nutch.storage.TestGoraStorage$1.call(TestGoraStorage.java:102)
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:722)
> {code}
> I believe that the final failure is due to to the use of TreeMap [5] as a 
> private object in MemStore. TreeMap implementations are not synchronized. If 
> multiple threads access a map concurrently, and at least one of the threads 
> modifies the map structurally, it must be synchronized externally. (A 
> structural modification is any operation that adds or deletes one or more 
> mappings; merely changing the value associated with an existing key is not a 
> structural modification.) This is typically accomplished by synchronizing on 
> some object that naturally encapsulates the map. If no such object exists, 
> the map should be "wrapped" using the Collections.synchronizedSortedMap 
> method. This is best done at creation time, to prevent accidental 
> unsynchronized access to the map e.g.
>    SortedMap m = Collections.synchronizedSortedMap(new TreeMap(...));
> N.B. The NOTE on TreeMap's come right from the Oracle JavaDoc.
> [3] 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/nutch/branches/2.x/src/test/org/apache/nutch/storage/TestGoraStorage.java?view=markup
> [4] 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/nutch/branches/2.x/src/test/org/apache/nutch/util/AbstractNutchTest.java?view=markup
> [5] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/TreeMap.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to