We need to VOTE on them, unfortunately, Lewis, Perhaps we could just get the VOTEs up quickly and proceed?
New bits = new VOTE is a general rule of thumb ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -----Original Message----- From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> Reply-To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <dev@gora.apache.org> Date: Monday, September 7, 2015 at 8:37 PM To: "<u...@gora.apache.org>" <u...@gora.apache.org> Cc: "<dev@gora.apache.org>" <dev@gora.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Gora 0.6.1 >Hi Henry, >OK, new release artifacts available. These are identical to the last ones >but with the offending files replaced and new sigs generated. >Do we need to VOTE on these or can we release? >Thanks >Lewis > >On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> I am good with that approach >> >> >> On Monday, September 7, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney < >> lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Crap Henry. Your absolutely right. Bugger. >>> These were of course local files I had lying around and have been >>> included!!! >>> Can I remove the files from the artifacts at >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ and simply re-stage them? >>> Thanks for review. >>> Lewis >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Henry Saputra >>><henry.sapu...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for driving the release, Lewis. >>>> >>>> +0 for me >>>> >>>> Checksum files look good >>>> Signature file looks good >>>> LICENCE file looks good >>>> NOTICE file looks good >>>> Source compiled and pass tests. >>>> >>>> But looks like in the source artifact after I unzip from >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ I saw extra files: >>>> GORA-262.patch and gora-267.diff >>>> >>>> Those files probably should not be there? >>>> >>>> - Henry >>>> >>>> >>>> - Henry >>>> >>>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney >>>> <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > Hi Folks, >>>> > I am very happy to get a VOTE out for Apache Gora 0.6.1 Release >>>> Candidate. >>>> > >>>> > We solved 21 issues: http://s.apache.org/l69 >>>> > >>>> > Git source tag (79fba16dc9bf0b1660861a233a218bc669173178): >>>> > http://s.apache.org/gora-0.6.1 >>>> > >>>> > Staging repo: >>>> > >>>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegora-1003 >>>> > >>>> > Source Release Artifacts: >>>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/gora/ >>>> > >>>> > PGP release keys (signed using 48BAEBF6 - Lewis John McGibbney): >>>> > http://gora.apache.org/dist/KEYS >>>> > >>>> > Vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>> > Thank you to everyone that is able to VOTE as well as everyone that >>>> > contributed to Apache Gora 0.6.1. >>>> > >>>> > [ ] +1, let's get it released!!! >>>> > [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before... >>>> > [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain wh >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > P.S. Here is my +1 >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Lewis >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Lewis* >>> >> > > >-- >*Lewis*
