[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16807610#comment-16807610
]
Kevin Ratnasekera commented on GORA-555:
----------------------------------------
[~c.uent] +1, Please avoid using if it s deprecated and use direct
alternatives. You will probably need to upgrade Lucene dependency in Gora in
the process.
> Improve Lucene query implementation with NumericRangeQuery
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GORA-555
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-555
> Project: Apache Gora
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Kevin Ratnasekera
> Priority: Major
>
> There are performance benefits around NumericRangeQuery. Please notice
> comment on LuceneQuery implementation.
> {code}
> //TODO: Change this to a NumericRangeQuery when necessary (it's faster)
> String lower = null;
> String upper = null;
> if (getStartKey() != null) {
> //Do we need to escape the term?
> lower = getStartKey().toString();
> }
> if (getEndKey() != null) {
> upper = getEndKey().toString();
> }
> if (upper == null && lower == null) {
> q = new MatchAllDocsQuery();
> } else {
> q = TermRangeQuery.newStringRange(pk, lower, upper, true, true);
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
