Hic Kevin, I'm done with the development. Let me create a pull request over the weekend for review. *Regards* Shashanka Balakuntala Srinivasa
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:10 AM Kevin Ratnasekera (Jira) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-86?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17060647#comment-17060647 > ] > > Kevin Ratnasekera commented on GORA-86: > --------------------------------------- > > [~balaShashanka] Do you have any update on this? > > > Support JOOQ API within gora-sql module > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > Key: GORA-86 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-86 > > Project: Apache Gora > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: gora-sql > > Affects Versions: 0.2 > > Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney > > Priority: Major > > Labels: gsoc2014, gsoc2016, mentor > > Fix For: 1.0 > > > > Attachments: gsoc_proposal.docx > > > > > > We've discussed this recently and Lukas Eder has been helpful enough to > provide an his opinion, which acts as an overview from a different > perspective, on whether JOOQ is appropriate for Gora. > > This issue should act as a separate but linked issue to GORA-74, and we > should discuss what happens to the SQL type code that we maintain within > Gora. As this module is not being utilised very much just now there is > really no overwhelming argument yet to adopt JOOQ, however hopefully we can > iron this out within the correspondence. > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian Jira > (v8.3.4#803005) >
