On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 09:15 -0600, John Murph wrote: > Thanks Tomek! My initial research shows that TestNG is much better in > this respect than JUnit, so I don't think it'll be a problem. > First let us remove the extraneous words:
" . . . TestNG is much better . . . than JUnit. . . . "
then let us elide the elisions:
"TestNG is much better than JUnit."
Now as this is a true statement it would be really cool if everyone
thought "How do we do this for TestNG?" and then as a follow up "How do
we do this for JUnit".
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder Partner
xmpp: [email protected]
Concertant LLP t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203
41 Buckmaster Road, f: +44 8700 516 084 voip: sip:[email protected]
London SW11 1EN, UK m: +44 7770 465 077 skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
