On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 16:55, Adam Murdoch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 22/02/2011, at 3:53 AM, Peter Niederwieser wrote:
>
> As I've learned today, the correct way to run a single test class is
> "-D<testTaskName>.single=FooTest". (Before I had thought that it's always
> "-Dtest.single=FooTest".) How about using a fixed system property instead?
> This would make the feature easier to use.
>
> One potential downside of using a fixed system property is that it would
> make it more difficult to fail the build if the naming pattern doesn't match
> anything (we would have to consider all test tasks to make this decision).
> But since this feature is mostly used interactively, I don't even consider
> it essential (though probably desirable) to fail the build.
>
> Since -Dtest.single is really about running a subset of tests, I also wonder
> if we could come up with a better name (e.g. -Dtest.include). But this is a
> minor complaint.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Using system properties just does't seem like the way to go. They're too
> imprecise, in that they apply globally, and opaque, in that there's no good
> way to discover what system properties are available for me to use.
> Instead, I think a command-line option might be better:
> gradle test --include SomePattern
> and
> gradle core:test --include SomePattern plugins:test --include
> SomeOtherPattern
> Or, more generally:
> gradle <task-independent-options> [<task> <task-specific-options>]...
> We would drive these using meta-data on the Test task type, so provide a
> general purpose way to tweak the model from the command-line. We already use
> this approach for 'gradle tasks --all', so it's just a matter of handling
> more types of properties (the implementation only handles boolean properties
> at the moment).
> Given that this is driven from the model, we can also provide the same
> options to tweak the configuration via the GUI/IDE, and can offer some way
> to discover the options using, say, 'gradle help <task>'.
>
> --
> Adam Murdoch
> Gradle Developer
> http://www.gradle.org
> CTO, Gradle Inc. - Gradle Training, Support, Consulting
> http://www.gradle.biz
>
>

Wasn't there a Hackergarten that created a rule to do this? Might need
to be re-factored based on this though.

-- 
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp

Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate

PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to