On 12 December 2011 15:48, Robert Watkins <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 13/12/2011, at 8:19 AM, Daz DeBoer wrote:
>
> Well as far as I know, ivy doesn't support the concept of "hard" version
> requirements. So ivy might support the [1.0] syntax, but I don't think it
> will behave the way maven does. (I'm not certain, because in Ivy the
> responsibility for ejecting versions is smeared between the
> DependencyResolver implementations and the Ivy ResolveEngine. So it may
> depend on the DependencyResolvers you have configured.)
>
>
> To the best of my knowledge, Ivy has the same end result. I'll expand my
> test cases to include an 'ant+ivy' example to verify that, and get back to
> you.
>
>
That would be great.

>
> Thanks for the feedback. We'll certainly look at supporting the idea of a
> "hard" dependency requirement.
>
>
> If I can get the project building in Eclipse, I'll certainly look into
> helping out in that respect.
>
>
Oooh. Eclipse user. Maybe you'd like to help out with our Eclipse support
too :).

-- 
Darrell (Daz) DeBoer
Principal Engineer, Gradleware
http://www.gradleware.com

Reply via email to