On 15/02/2012, at 11:06 PM, Peter Niederwieser wrote: > We should definitely support Groovy property notation (project.ext.foo = > "bar"), and maybe nothing else, to make it clear that this feature is only > for ad-hoc properties in build scripts.
That would definitely be supported (but not for registration), but supporting nothing else seems unnecessary to me. I'd also prefer to avoid Groovy types on the interface, but of course the implementation will implement the groovy sugar. -- Luke Daley Principal Engineer, Gradleware http://gradleware.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
