What about Luke's suggestion (last comment at
http://forums.gradle.org/gradle/topics/jacocoreport_tasks_dont_have_dependencies_on_tasks_that_produce_coverage_data)
to finalize test task with jacoco task? Then you would always get a
coverage report whenever test is being run and jacoco plugin is applied.


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Szczepan Faber <
szczepan.fa...@gradleware.com> wrote:

> Thanks Andrew, this helps a lot.
>
> Jacoco report task that is introduced by our plugin is coupled with a
> particular test task. There's no use case I can think of running the jacoco
> report without running this test task before. Effectively, the user needs
> to always include this particular test task explicitly at the command line,
> which is kind of awkward (and surprising for new users). I'd like to change
> this sometime this week and replace mustRunAfter with dependsOn. I'll do it
> unless someone replies with a good story that supports mustRunAfter ;)
>
> @Rene, can you comment on the use of relative paths? E.g. what's the
> intention?
>
> @Andrew, I forgot to say my thanks for the contribution. The experience is
> so much better than with the coverage plugins I used in the past.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:32 PM, <andrew.obers...@securian.com> wrote:
>
>> Some related discussions for your 1st and 3rd points.
>>
>>
>> *http://forums.gradle.org/gradle/topics/jacocoreport_tasks_dont_have_dependencies_on_tasks_that_produce_coverage_data*<http://forums.gradle.org/gradle/topics/jacocoreport_tasks_dont_have_dependencies_on_tasks_that_produce_coverage_data>
>> *http://issues.gradle.org/browse/GRADLE-2764*<http://issues.gradle.org/browse/GRADLE-2764>
>>
>> You can see some stuff in the history of JacocoTaskExtension related to
>> #2. There were some issues with some of the tests failing as noted in my
>> original pull request.
>>
>>
>> *https://github.com/gradle/gradle/commits/master/subprojects/jacoco/src/main/groovy/org/gradle/testing/jacoco/plugins/JacocoTaskExtension.groovy*<https://github.com/gradle/gradle/commits/master/subprojects/jacoco/src/main/groovy/org/gradle/testing/jacoco/plugins/JacocoTaskExtension.groovy>
>> *https://github.com/gradle/gradle/pull/138*<https://github.com/gradle/gradle/pull/138>
>>
>> The doFirst was to make the evaluation of the arguments lazy. Could be a
>> better way, but that's all I thought of at the time.
>>
>>
>> Andrew Oberstar
>>
>> Szczepan Faber <szczepan.fa...@gradleware.com> wrote on 11/20/2013
>> 08:19:48 AM:
>>
>> > From: Szczepan Faber <szczepan.fa...@gradleware.com>
>> > To: dev@gradle.codehaus.org,
>> > Date: 11/20/2013 08:19 AM
>> > Subject: [gradle-dev] jacoco questions
>> >
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > I have a couple of questions re jacoco:
>> >
>> >  - jacoco tasks don't depend on test tasks. So running 'jacoco' has
>> > no effect (task is skipped). Is this intentional? I think jacoco
>> > report task should depend on test task that produces the input.
>> >
>> >  - the agent arguments use relative paths. What is the reason of
>> > using relative paths? Is it to conserve the length of the args? If
>> > absolute paths are used, it's easier to hook up jacoco for e2e
>> > integration tests (e.g. container needs to start with agent
>> > settings) because the getAsJvmArgs() method can be used to build
>> > agent arguments.
>> >
>> >  - some html reports allow to navigate to the class level and
>> > inspect the class visually, by looking at decorated source file.
>> > However some classes are not decorated - e.g. I can only see the
>> > tabular view of the coverage, but cannot drill down to the decorated
>> > source file. I haven't figured out the pattern of when it works or
>> > not. Anyone knows about this issue?
>> >
>> >  - I've noticed that doFirst() is used to configure test tasks'
>> > jvmargs. Currently, the up-to-date checks don't work reliably when
>> > task inputs or outputs are changed during this task execution.
>> >
>> > Cheers!
>> > --
>> > Szczepan Faber
>> > Principal engineer@gradle; Founder@mockito
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Szczepan Faber
> Principal engineer@gradle; Founder@mockito
>

Reply via email to