I think the only thing we can do is to ask Codehaus for removal. Not sure
if this affects in any way the nabble/markmail archives.

I will figure it out.

Hans

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Daz DeBoer <darrell.deb...@gradleware.com>
wrote:

> Are we able to disable posting to the old list? I don't have any admin
> access.
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Szczepan Faber <szcze...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Sure, sorry, old habits die hard.
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:55 PM, Hans Dockter
>> <hans.dock...@gradleware.com> wrote:
>> > BTW: I wanted to send someone the link to this discussion and just
>> > discovered that we are using the old dev list. Can we have all future
>> dev
>> > discussions on: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gradle-dev
>> >
>> > Hans
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Adam Murdoch <
>> adam.murd...@gradleware.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 25 Sep 2014, at 6:01 am, Justin Ryan <quidr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I really like how the tooling api can respect the
>> >> gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties file, unlike the gradle or
>> gradlew
>> >> scripts. I created a project that is essentially wrapping a main method
>> >> around the tooling api, it lets me run it from any projects and have it
>> >> respect the gradle-wrapper.properties file (which is the minimum
>> someone
>> >> would need to check in). I consequently don't need the .jar file or the
>> >> shell scripts checked in. The project is here:
>> >>
>> >> https://github.com/quidryan/skipper
>> >>
>> >> To make it a little more useful, I do a trick with zip files that lets
>> me
>> >> make the zip file executable in unix-y OS's. So, for me, I run this in
>> any
>> >> Gradle project:
>> >>
>> >> skipper clean bulid
>> >>
>> >> I'm not saying everyone should use skipper, but it would be nice if the
>> >> default behavior of gradle shell script did this.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Absolutely it should.
>> >>
>> >> Would you be interesting in contributing 'skipper' to Gradle core via a
>> >> pull request? We could include it in the Gradle distribution as an
>> >> alternative to 'gradle' and then we can merge the two over time, so
>> that the
>> >> default 'gradle' launcher just did the right thing.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Szczepan Faber <szcze...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hey guys,
>> >>>
>> >>> For some scenarios (source releases of apache projects) it is useful
>> >>> if Gradle offers provisioning without the need of the wrapper.jar
>> >>> (e.g. keep the goodness of the wrapper but without any jar involved).
>> >>> For example, check out the discussion in kafka project:
>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1490
>> >>>
>> >>> Are there any plans/ideas for having wrapper capability without the
>> jar?
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers!
>> >>> --
>> >>> Szczepan Faber
>> >>> Core dev@gradle; Founder@mockito
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >>>
>> >>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Adam Murdoch
>> >> Gradle Co-founder
>> >> http://www.gradle.org
>> >> CTO Gradleware Inc. - Gradle Training, Support, Consulting
>> >> http://www.gradleware.com
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Szczepan Faber
>> Core dev@gradle; Founder@mockito
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Darrell (Daz) DeBoer
> http://www.gradleware.com
>

Reply via email to