+1, thank you to bring this! On 2025/10/31 11:40:08 Xiaokang wrote: > Hello, Apache GraphAr(incubating) Community, > > We recently held in-depth discussions with the LDBC LEX (LDBC Extended GQL > Schema) team. Based on these conversations, we propose making adjustments > to Graphar’s current Schema YAML format and would like to solicit your > feedback. > > LEX, which is part of the GDC (Graph Data Council) Text2GraphQuery project > focused on property graphs, is a proposed strict superset of GQL graph > types and as a proposal to WG3 for possible future standardization. LEX > includes many of the same players as the WG3 international and INCITS U.S. > national standards bodies. > > LEX has expressed strong interest in Graphar’s current approach of using > YAML to represent graph schemas, and we have already engaged in several > productive discussions on this topic. > > Given the strong alignment between LEX’s goals for graph storage > standardization and Graphar’s own mission, we believe this presents a > valuable opportunity for collaboration. To better integrate with the LEX > ecosystem, we plan to adapt Graphar’s YAML format to conform as closely as > possible to LEX’s proposed syntax, this may require changes to our current > YAML structure. > > We therefore seek your input: Should Graphar evolve its YAML schema based > on the LEX schema? > > The VOTE will be open for at least 72 hours and until the necessary number > of votes are reached. > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > To learn more about apache graphar, please see https://graphar.apache.org/ >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
