+1 (binding) for GitHub wiki, Confluence offers more advanced features, while Wiki is simpler and integrates with GitHub. Since our primary goal is to organize documents and our requirements are straightforward, I prefer using Wiki.
> 2024年8月19日 20:30，roryqi <[email protected]> 写道： > > After surveying on many Apache projects, only Superset uses Github wiki. > Its wiki only shows simple information. > ASF Confluence is adopted by many projects. It seems more formal. > > +1 (non-binding) for ASF Confluence. > > Rory > > Minghuang Li <[email protected]> 于2024年8月19日周一 19:11写道： > >> Hi Jerry, >> >> Thank you for bringing this up. I fully support establishing a hub for >> developer and community >> documentation. >> >> ASF Confluence is preferable due to its richer features, despite GitHub >> wiki's proximity to our >> codebase. >> >> I endorse moving forward with Confluence for better document management. >> >> Best regards, >> Minghuang Li >> >> On 2024/08/19 10:15:18 Saisai Shao wrote: >>> Hi team, >>> >>> Currently, we have user-facing docs for users, but we're lacking >>> developer-facing docs for developers. By investigating other projects, >> they >>> typically use Github wiki or ASF confluence for developer/community >> related >>> things. >>> >>> So here are two questions: >>> >>> 1. Shall we have a developer/community face document hub to manage all >> the >>> docs? >>> 2. If so, what is your preference, Github wiki or ASF confluence? >>> >>> Best, >>> Jerry >>> >>
