GitHub user lzh010817 created a discussion: Proposal for Integrating Redis 
Distributed Cache alongside Caffeine for Enhanced Scalability and Consistency​

      I would like to initiate a discussion regarding the potential integration 
of ​Redis-based distributed caching​ to complement the existing Caffeine local 
cache. While Caffeine excels in providing low-latency, in-memory caching for 
single-node deployments, Gravitino may benefit from a distributed caching layer 
to address challenges in ​high-concurrency scenarios​ and ​multi-node 
environments.

**​Key Considerations for Redis Integration:​​**

1. ​**Scalability & Horizontal Expansion:**
    As Gravitino scales horizontally, node-specific local caches (e.g., 
Caffeine) may lead to ​data inconsistency​ during node restarts or parallel 
operations. Redis, as a distributed cache, could ensure ​consistent metadata 
access​ across all nodes, reducing redundant backend queries and improving 
throughput.
2. ​Cache Consistency & Fault Tolerance:
    Redis offers features like ​persistence​, ​replication, and ​automatic 
failover​, which mitigate risks of cache loss during node failures. This aligns 
with Gravitino’s need for reliable metadata management in distributed setups.
3. ​Performance Optimization:
    While Caffeine provides nanosecond-level access latency, Redis can handle 
​cross-node cache synchronization​ with minimal latency penalties using 
pipelining and cluster-mode operations. For frequently accessed metadata (e.g., 
catalog details), Redis could serve as a shared L2 cache, while Caffeine 
remains the L1 node-local cache.
4. ​Implementation Approach:
    4.1 Introduce a ​cache abstraction layer​ to support pluggable cache 
providers (e.g., Caffeine for local, Redis for distributed).
    4.2 Lever ​Redis Cluster​ for high availability and ​cache strategies​ to 
preload hot metadata on startup.
    4.3 Use ​key-based expiration and invalidation​ policies to ensure data 
freshness across nodes.

**​Open Questions for Community Feedback:​​**

- Are there specific use cases in Gravitino where ​distributed caching​ would 
provide the most value (e.g., multi-region deployments, frequent schema 
updates)?

- How might we balance the ​trade-offs​ between added infrastructure complexity 
(Redis cluster management) and performance gains?

- Would a ​hybrid cache architecture​ (Caffeine + Redis) be feasible, and what 
strategies could optimize cache coherence?

I believe exploring Redis integration could strengthen Gravitino’s performance 
in distributed environments while maintaining backward compatibility. Looking 
forward to your insights and collaboration!



GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/discussions/8480

----
This is an automatically sent email for [email protected].
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]

Reply via email to