Was reviewing our roadmap@ http://gparsdocs.de.a9sapp.eu/Roadmap.html showing GPars 1.3.0 and 1.4.0 so if you think a point release@ 1.3.0 would be a good idea, am happy to update docs to reflect your decision. You will just need to let me know which URL to use to point our docs at, repo-wise.
Can we use Apache or is that a bridge too far ? Or perhaps a new branch within our GitHub GPars repo ? Have asked Schalk about Artifactory and Bintray for a SNAPSHOT so may have some news there soon - maybe ;-} jim On Tuesday, 5 January 2016 15:24:11 UTC+1, Russel Winder wrote: > > Groovy currently ships with GPars 1.2.1, I wonder if we should > contemplate switching to 1.3.0 (not as yet released) for the Groovy > 2.5.0 release. Not the 2.4.6 release obviously since a change of > dependency not driven by a bug fix is probably not a good thing. > > Obviously we have not released a GPars since the demise of Codehaus so > we need to try creating a SNAPSHOT and/or RC release that is not a > formal release for people to try and then do a formal 1.3.0 release. > > I tried to do something on this last year but stuff got in the way. I > fully expect to have lots of time on my hands for the next couple of > months… > > -- > Russel. > ============================================================================= > > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russ...@ekiga.net > <javascript:> > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk > <javascript:> > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > >
