GR8 idea Paul. Would you have any thoughts for the GPars roadmap, pls.? See this: http://gparsdocs.de.a9sapp.eu/Roadmap.html - ideas welcome 😊
Sent from my iPad > On 20 Jan 2016, at 13:49, Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > > I think it would be good to have some kind of minimal roadmap in the > new documentation to replace the old page but I agree as others have > said that there is no point in having unrealistic goals - so something > quite small is what I think we need. I'll try to come up with > something hopefully next week unless someone else wants to jump in. > > Cheers, Paul. > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:18 AM, Marc Paquette <mar...@mac.com> wrote: >> WaybackMachine has it : here is the entry on 2015-01-02 : >> https://web.archive.org/web/20150102193203/http://groovy.codehaus.org/Roadmap >> >> But, as Cédric says, it is definetely not realistic (in retrospective :-)... >> >> >> Le 19 janv. 2016 à 14:13, Cédric Champeau <cedric.champ...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> >> I honestly don't think it's a problem that the roadmap disappeared. I have >> never seen a single Groovy roadmap that was up-to-date or realistic. My >> personal thought it that the roadmap is what the users want. So it depends >> on the pull requests we get, as well as what users want us to implement. At >> best, we can have a 3 to 6 months roadmap, but anything longer is >> unrealistic. >> >> 2016-01-19 20:10 GMT+01:00 Pascal Schumacher <pascalschumac...@gmx.net>: >>> >>> The roadmap document disappeared together with codehaus :( >>> >>> >>>> Am 19.01.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Aseem Bansal: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> This came up during gr8conf India. I asked Paul King and he said that to >>>> ask the community so it is known. >>>> >>>> I tried looking for groovy's roadmap but couldn't find anything. Where is >>>> it present? >> >>
