Will we be needing any doco changes for GPars 2.0 Russel ? On 19 December 2016 at 07:34, Russel Winder <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 09:34 +0000, Russel Winder wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 09:26 +0100, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > > > You always forget to give me precise details! 😜 > > > JDK 9 is a very vague context! > > > > What is the latest JDK9? > > Having actually read the Oracle JDK9 EA licence, I find I (and I > suspect almost everyone) cannot comply with the terms as stated (as > opposed to the ones probably intended). I have therefore removed all my > Oracle JDK9 installs so as to be compliant. > > Until Fedora Rawhide has an OpenJDK9 package, I won't be running JDK9 > on that platform. Debian Experimental has an OpenJDK9 package so over > Christmas I will be installing and using that. So for now OpenJDK8 > only, and hence no Gradle problems. Also no Asciidoctor problem so I > can build the documentation again. > > Once I have both OpenJDK8 and OpenJDK9, I should be able to start work > on getting GPars 2.0 into a fit state for release. > > -- > Russel. > ============================================================ > ================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
