a nice idea ;-D
On 7 January 2017 at 18:30, Jesper Steen Møller <jes...@selskabet.org> wrote: > But > > Wouldn’t << be a natural choice which would work today? > > -Jesper > > > On 7 Jan 2017, at 18.16, Daniel Sun <realblue...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > As we all know, GPars is awesome in concurrency programming. How > about > > introducing a new syntax for GPars's > > actor(http://www.gpars.org/guide/guide/actors.html) to support > concurrency > > programming better like Erlang and > > Scala(https://rocketeer.be/articles/concurrency-in-erlang-scala/)? We > can > > use <- to indicate sending messages(Erlang and Scala uses !). The initial > > idea is shown as follows: > > > > // groovy.actor.Actor extends groovyx.gpars.actor.DefaultActor > > class Counter extends groovy.actor.Actor { > > int counter = 0; > > > > void act() { > > react { int num -> > > ... > > } > > } > > } > > > > class ActorTest { > > def counter = new Counter() > > counter.start() > > > > for (i in 0 .. 100000) { > > counter <- i // send message to the counter actor > > } > > } > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > Cheers, > > Daniel.Sun > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: http://groovy.329449.n5. > nabble.com/About-actor-syntax-for-Groovy-3-tp5737574.html > > Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
