On April 8, 2017 7:35:18 PM GMT+02:00, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> wrote: >On 08.04.2017 16:29, Remi Forax wrote: >> Jochen, >> technically, you do not need the jdk 9, >> you can compile with jdk 8 and have a jar that contains the >declaration >> of methods of the jdk 9 you want. > >and use -Xbootclasspath/p:path? yes, I guess we can do that. >JDK-8177827 >will get in the way, but that is minor. Too bad that is in the future >no >real option anymore because of JDK-8177844.
you can use --patch-module, 8177844 is about --patch-module having the side effect of making the module upgradeable, i.e. being able to replace the module instead of patching it. > But that will not affect us right now > >> JRuby had worked that way when it was jdk 6 compatible but optionally >> uses the java.lang.invoke API. > >yeah, good idea ;) > >bye Jochen Rémi -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
