+group On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:00 AM Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Paul, > > Awesome, I will provide my analysis on GROOVY-5227 soon. Thank you! > > Regards, > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 2:06 AM Paul King <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Hi Yazad, >> >> I wouldn't bother with GROOVY-7388. I can imagine some scenarios where >> ambiguous messages might occur but they wouldn't involve normal usage of >> those methods. I have closed for now. If the OP provides more information >> we can pursue that one. >> >> GROOVY-5227 seems worthy of investigation. An analysis would be great. >> >> Hopefully some more tickets will be ready over the next few days based on >> my other email. >> >> Cheers, Paul. >> >> >> On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Yazad Khambata <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have been looking around to see if there some simple items I can >>> pick up to make some initial contributions. I see 3 trivial tickets >>> that I can work on if that's ok, >>> >>> GROOVY-7388 >>> DefaultGroovyMethods class's plus(T[] left, xxxx<T> right) have >>> ambiguous errors >>> >>> In this ticket I see Paul has requested a test case and has not >>> received a response, I could look at providing a test case and a fix >>> for this. Note I see that there also a duplicate filed but that is >>> closed without any work-log or comments. >>> >>> GROOVY-5227 >>> AbstractHttpServlet should extend GenericServlet directly instead of >>> HttpServlet >>> >>> Looks like this is one of the tickets where I may be able to provide >>> some analysis and suggestions and based on that a decision can be made >>> to either close it or implement it. >>> >>> Both tickets have had some comments in 2016 but don't seem to have an >>> owner. Please let me know if I can pick them up. Thank you. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Yazad Khambata >>> >> >>
