Sounds like it might be useful for Groovy 4+.
On 5 Sep. 2017 5:09 am, "Jochen Theodorou" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > since Graal is now available in JDK9 by default I was wondering if we > should go into a path for deep integration with Graal if we can take > advantage of it. > > In the past I was quite partial to this because of the licensing of Graal > itself. I know from before it was GPL with or without classpath extension. > But even with classpath extension I was not feeling well about depending on > it and the trouble users would have go through to setup an optional Graal > part. > > Well, now since it is part of JDK9 those troubles are of the past. Now > everyone has a ready to use Graal afaik. And we do no longer have to > distribute it. That means we can consider really depending on it, like we > depend on the Java platform itself. > > How do others think? > > bye Jochen >
